NCSA Center-Directed Discretionary Research (CDDR)

 

NCSA is committed to enabling new, innovative research by providing seed funding for NCSA staff through a competitive proposal process.

Pre-proposal Deadline:

Any time but no later than Monday, February 13th to be considered for the current round

Full Proposal Deadline (due by 11:59 pm CT): 

Next deadline is Friday, February 24, 2023

SUMMARY OF PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

General Information

Program Title:

NCSA Center-Directed Discretionary Research (CDDR)

Program Objectives (Synopsis of Program):

  1. Maintain the scientific and technical vitality of NCSA.
  2. Enhance NCSA’s ability to address future University of Illinois’ and funding agencies’ missions.
  3. Serve as a proving ground for new concepts in research and development, including high-risk, potentially high-value ideas.

Proposed projects should align with NCSA’s Vision, Mission and Strategic Goals.  Proposed projects can but are not limited to providing early support for development of new R&D instruments (technologies) or providing the flexibility to respond quickly to new R&D opportunities, including developing concept work often required by agency funding Request for Proposals (RFPs).

Award Information

NCSA is committed to enabling new, innovative research by providing seed funding for NCSA staff through a competitive proposal process.

Estimated Number of Awards: 2-3

Anticipated Funding Amount: $150,000

Eligibility Information

*NCSA Staff MUST discuss their participation on a proposal with their manager. This discussion and subsequent approval should occur prior to the submission of the CDDR pre-proposal form.

Who may serve as PI: The PI of a CDDR proposal must be a full-time NCSA staff member. Faculty with zero percent affiliate positions may participate as a team member.

Proposal Preparation and Submission Instructions

*NOTE:  The NCSA Proposal Development Office (PDO) is available to assist in developing CDDR proposals.

Pre-Proposal

Fill out the contact information with the correct information:

There is a 12-month initial maximum duration for all projects; if more work is planned, it should be made clear in the project description, and it will be contingent on results of the first 12 months, so expected results during this period should also be discussed in the description. If you are developing a multi-year project, please discuss this with the Proposal Development Office in advance.

Proposal Process:

Full Proposal

When you have completed the form, press ‘Submit’ only once. It will take time to upload the submission. *Please note* Full proposals should not be submitted until your pre-proposal form has been approved (see "Pre-Proposal" section above.)

The full CDDR proposal is limited to 5 pages (not including bios) and should consist of:

    1. Proposal Title
    2. Abstract (1/2 page)
    3. Project Description
      1. Scientific and Technical Opportunity
      2. Context
        1. Description of similar previous work (who, what, when and relationship to this project)
        2. How the proposed work is unique and innovative
        3. Clear understanding of any competition or partnership opportunities
    4. Benefits, Beneficiaries, and Customers as related to the Center as a whole
      1. Approach
        1. Nature of work
        2. Deliverables
        3. Milestones and Timeline
        4. Leveraging of external activities
        5. Expected results
      2. Investigator(s) (Bios may be included at end of proposal)
      3. Resources Required
        1. Key Skills
        2. Existing Staff
        3. Equipment
      4. Future Funding Opportunities
        1. Identify specific funding sources and outline a future funding plan/path to sustainability
      5. Budget and Budget Justification - please follow the requirements in the Budgetary Information section below.

Budgetary Information

It is anticipated that the majority of the budget will be to support staff and student time.  Other costs may be allowed as described below.  Any questions with respect to allowability of costs should be addressed with the Proposal Development Office.

Proposal Review Information Criteria

Review Process 

Competitive proposals will present a well-defined research plan that leverages Center resources and external activities, benefits NCSA and the University of Illinois strategic plans, and provide a clear path to sustainability. Awards are made subject to the availability of funds and review committee’s recommendations.

Merit Review Criteria

  1. Significance

    1. Does the proposed research hold scientific, technical and marketing merit?

    2. Does the proposed research address an important problem or a critical barrier to progress in the field?

    3. Does the proposed research present a clear and compelling connection to NCSA’s Vision, Mission, and Strategic Goals?

  2. Innovation
    1. Is the proposed research novel, innovative or original?
    2. Is there a clear understanding of competition and how it differs from related work?
  3. Investigators
    1. Does the proposed research leverage NCSA scientific and technical expertise from one or more NCSA groups and/or develops skills and expertise in one or more NCSA groups?
    2. Are the qualifications of the investigators appropriate and adequate for the proposed research?
  4. Approach
    1. Is the written proposal clear and complete, including any graphics?
    2. Are the overall strategy, methodology, and analysis well-reasoned and appropriate to accomplish the scientific aims of the proposed research?
    3. Are potential problems, alternative strategies and benchmarks for success presented?
    4. Is the proposed research likely to be successful for the duration and funds proposed? Are NCSA support, equipment, and other resources available to the investigators adequate for the proposed research?
    5. Does the proposed research include plan(s) for continued collaboration and pursuit of external funding from Federal agencies, Foundations or Industry? 
    6. If the proposed research proves to be successful, is there strong potential for follow-on funding?

Acceptance of Funding Conditions

PI Funding Responsibilities

Accruals

Project funds will be monitored on encumbrances, including commitments to pay for goods and/or services that have been received/supplied but not paid for or invoiced.

Award Administration Information

Each project must submit reports after three and six months, in addition to a year-end summary to the NCSA Director’s Office, which will be reviewed by the CDDR Program office, who will provide feedback.

Timeline

(Note that this timeline currently includes one set of projects being proposed, selected, and funded each year, but the committee wants to leave the opportunity for this to be expanded to two cycles annually if sufficient budget is available. For this reason, “Spring Start” is used for these projects, recognizing that we may add “Fall Start” projects in the future.)


mid-January

Spring cycle kick-off; discuss how to write a good proposal

now-February 13

Accepting pre-proposal submissions

now-February 17

Approving pre-proposals (please allow five business days)

Last Friday in February

Full spring-start proposal submission deadline

First three weeks of March

Spring-start Proposal Reviews conducted

Last week of March

Recommendations for spring-start projects provided to EAD of Engagement

First week of April

Recommendations for spring-start projects sent to Exec Committee

Mid-April

Recommendations for spring-start projects sent to Director for approval

May 1

Notifications to proposers on review outcomes for spring-start projects

May

Writing and processing MOUs for approved spring-start projects; accounts set up with Business Office

June 1

Start date for spring-start projects.

September 1

Three month report due for spring-start projects

December 1

Six month report for spring-start projects due

June 1

Final Reports for spring-start projects due; schedule a presentation of the project to NCSA staff

FAQs

Can I request time to work on the development of the proposal?

The PI may request up to 5% time for one month for proposal development through the pre-proposal form.

Previously Funded Projects

NOTE: These projects were supported under the prior program definition. With this update, some may be less relevant as examples.  The committee debated whether to include them and decided they provide at least some examples and are beneficial.

Project Start Date

Title

PI

Co-PIs

January 2019 

NCSA Computational Program in Racial Health Disparities

Liudmila Sergeevna Mainzer

Zeyneyp Madak-Erdogan

Ruby Mendenhall

Aiman Soliman

Vlad Kindratenko

May 2019

Measuring Astrophysical Variability in DES and LSST

Eric Morganson

Samantha Thrush

Athol Kemball

August 2019

PixSure Image Annotation System

Colleen Bushell

Peter Groves

August 2019

ICI Shared Monitoring and Metrics Infrastructure

J.D. Maloney

Corey Eichelberger

Mark Fredrickson

Paul Gudor

October 2020

NCSA Working Group on Applied AI for Wildlife Conservation

Aiman Soliman

Brian Allen

Nathan Robinson

Steven Kessel

May 2021

Advancement development of NExt-generation sequencing Analysis Toolkit (NEAT), for standardized biomedical analyses

Joshua Allen

Christina Fliege


August 2021

Taming amphotericin B, the antifungal drug of last resort: making it safe and effective

Vlad Kindratenko

Taras Pogorelov